<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attachment parenting is not&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/</link>
	<description>...exploring the art and science of parenting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What is attachment parenting</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-12832</link>
		<dc:creator>What is attachment parenting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-12832</guid>
		<description>[...] Attachment parenting is not… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attachment parenting is not… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motherhoodmmts</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>Motherhoodmmts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>WONDERFUL post! So many people give me the impression that I&#039;m somehow HURTING my child by practicing attachment parenting. As though communicating and understanding your baby&#039;s needs is harmful!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WONDERFUL post! So many people give me the impression that I&#8217;m somehow HURTING my child by practicing attachment parenting. As though communicating and understanding your baby&#8217;s needs is harmful!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanny Abitbol</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8353</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanny Abitbol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8353</guid>
		<description>Great post as usual! My favourite point is &quot;Attachment parenting is not permissive parenting.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as usual! My favourite point is &#8220;Attachment parenting is not permissive parenting.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phdinparenting</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>phdinparenting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Sarah V. :&lt;/strong&gt; Fair enough. Perhaps I need to tackle that in another post then. I wanted to do a quick post that day and link to some people that have pondered these issues. I have been thinking of doing a post on the martyr concept. Can&#039;t promise when I&#039;ll get to it though. That said, I d think that attachment parenting is an easier (prefer that to &quot;superior&quot;) route to attachment and bonding. I wouldn&#039;t be doing it otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Sarah V. :</strong> Fair enough. Perhaps I need to tackle that in another post then. I wanted to do a quick post that day and link to some people that have pondered these issues. I have been thinking of doing a post on the martyr concept. Can&#8217;t promise when I&#8217;ll get to it though. That said, I d think that attachment parenting is an easier (prefer that to &#8220;superior&#8221;) route to attachment and bonding. I wouldn&#8217;t be doing it otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah V.</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8249</guid>
		<description>As someone who *does* think that AP is far too prone to use false benchmarks to measure parenting, I have to say that you don’t seem to have provided anything in the link above to counter this.  I find that AP sites and discussions seem to put quite disproportionate emphasis on extended breastfeeding, babywearing and bedsharing as some kind of superior path to bonding with your child.  No, they’re not rules in the sense that anyone would be penalised or thrown out of the group for not following them.  But, for all the disclaimers thrown in about how you don’t have to follow all these practices to be AP, they’re still very much presented as the ideal to strive towards unless you’ve got some good excuse why not.  From the links you’ve chosen above, it’s clear you also see these as being a vital part of what the AP movement is all about.  They may not be rules, but I think they do come across as checkboxes on a list.

As to whether AP is a fad or not – no, I don’t think I’d use that word, because even in its current incarnation AP practices have been around for longer than I’d associate with the word ‘fad’.  But I do think there’s a real sense in which they’re the latest in thing, and I think that that has very little to do with how long people have been practicing these for and a great deal to do with *why* they’re being practiced.  No, there’s nothing new about breastfeeding your child into childhood, or carrying a baby everywhere, or taking your baby into your bed.  But the reason people have been doing these things for centuries is because that happened to be a) what suited the particular lifestyles that people had at the time and b) what mainstream practice *was* at the time.  What’s new, and the ‘in thing’, isn’t the practices themselves, but the way in which they’re hyped as being some sort of superior way of doing things that everyone should be aiming for.

This isn’t an anti-AP polemic – I don’t have anything against AP practices, and I’ve used most of them myself.  But I do think that there’s another thing that AP is not.  It is not some sort of superior route to attachment and bonding.  And that’s the myth I’d most like to see debunked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who *does* think that AP is far too prone to use false benchmarks to measure parenting, I have to say that you don’t seem to have provided anything in the link above to counter this.  I find that AP sites and discussions seem to put quite disproportionate emphasis on extended breastfeeding, babywearing and bedsharing as some kind of superior path to bonding with your child.  No, they’re not rules in the sense that anyone would be penalised or thrown out of the group for not following them.  But, for all the disclaimers thrown in about how you don’t have to follow all these practices to be AP, they’re still very much presented as the ideal to strive towards unless you’ve got some good excuse why not.  From the links you’ve chosen above, it’s clear you also see these as being a vital part of what the AP movement is all about.  They may not be rules, but I think they do come across as checkboxes on a list.</p>
<p>As to whether AP is a fad or not – no, I don’t think I’d use that word, because even in its current incarnation AP practices have been around for longer than I’d associate with the word ‘fad’.  But I do think there’s a real sense in which they’re the latest in thing, and I think that that has very little to do with how long people have been practicing these for and a great deal to do with *why* they’re being practiced.  No, there’s nothing new about breastfeeding your child into childhood, or carrying a baby everywhere, or taking your baby into your bed.  But the reason people have been doing these things for centuries is because that happened to be a) what suited the particular lifestyles that people had at the time and b) what mainstream practice *was* at the time.  What’s new, and the ‘in thing’, isn’t the practices themselves, but the way in which they’re hyped as being some sort of superior way of doing things that everyone should be aiming for.</p>
<p>This isn’t an anti-AP polemic – I don’t have anything against AP practices, and I’ve used most of them myself.  But I do think that there’s another thing that AP is not.  It is not some sort of superior route to attachment and bonding.  And that’s the myth I’d most like to see debunked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kids can thrive in a single parent home &#124; Parenting Help in Maine</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8239</link>
		<dc:creator>Kids can thrive in a single parent home &#124; Parenting Help in Maine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8239</guid>
		<description>[...] Attachment parenting is notâ?¦ &#124; PhD in Parenting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attachment parenting is notâ?¦ | PhD in Parenting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8123</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8123</guid>
		<description>Exactly! Thank you for writing this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! Thank you for writing this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>kgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this! People that don&#039;t know me very well consider me a lenient, manipulated hippie because I practice AP. Many myths need to be debunked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this! People that don&#8217;t know me very well consider me a lenient, manipulated hippie because I practice AP. Many myths need to be debunked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bessie.viola</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8076</link>
		<dc:creator>bessie.viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>Oh my gosh... this is making me tear up a bit. That poor thing, I&#039;ll come rock that baby to sleep! Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my gosh&#8230; this is making me tear up a bit. That poor thing, I&#8217;ll come rock that baby to sleep! Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bessie.viola</title>
		<link>http://www.phdinparenting.com/2009/06/18/attachment-parenting-is-not/#comment-8075</link>
		<dc:creator>bessie.viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phdinparenting.com/?p=1975#comment-8075</guid>
		<description>I love this. I would classify myself as a leaning-attachment parent; for our next baby we&#039;ll probably be more so, simply because I didn&#039;t really know about it prior to Madeline&#039;s birth. I&#039;ve caught some flak from family for embracing the concept of &quot;child-led&quot; parenting, where we respond to her needs rather than a schedule, but it&#039;s worked so well that the comments have really subsided. 

I&#039;m proud to lean attachment and I&#039;m happy to have resources like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this. I would classify myself as a leaning-attachment parent; for our next baby we&#8217;ll probably be more so, simply because I didn&#8217;t really know about it prior to Madeline&#8217;s birth. I&#8217;ve caught some flak from family for embracing the concept of &#8220;child-led&#8221; parenting, where we respond to her needs rather than a schedule, but it&#8217;s worked so well that the comments have really subsided. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m proud to lean attachment and I&#8217;m happy to have resources like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
