I am nearing in on the final few hours of a mostly beautiful fall long weekend. While visiting my parents for Canadian Thanksgiving, I woke up this morning thinking about the Sunday walks that we sometimes took with my dad. We would head out into the woods, exploring the inofficial trails, the apple trees along the way, the tall pine forests, the garter snakes, and even an occasional broken down old car or bicycle that must have been over 50 years old. I peered out at the houses of my childhood friends, 4 girls about my age that were all a stone’s throw from my home. We used to spend countless hours in each other’s yards, hiding in the woods, picking berries, riding bicycles, climbing trees, catching frogs, discovering old tree forts and getting told to “get lost” by the teenagers who claimed them as their own. But those woods that my dad used to take us walking in are now suburbs, with paved roads, groomed lawns, and sprawling SUVs in the driveway.
So we went off in search of somewhere for a Sunday walk and came to the conclusion that there weren’t a lot of options that didn’t involve either getting in the car to drive to nature or dodging traffic as we tried to enjoy nature. Unfortunately as we pondered our options and made our plans, the rain set in and being unprepared for the weather we ended up just doing a short trip around a the Eco Museum (an outdoor animal park with local wildlife) instead of a long walk through the trees of the Morgan Aboretum.
In general, we are lucky that we live close to nature. Our kids can play in the dirt, the weeds, the leaves or the snow on our property or they can walk just past our neighbours house to go to the beach and play in the water, throw rocks into the lake, look for frogs, pick berries, and do a lot of the things that I loved as a child. But our time and our space outdoors does still seem more limited than it was when I was a child. Between work and school, errands, and visiting friends (since we don’t live near anyone that we socialize with), it seems there isn’t as much time to just get outside and enjoy nature.
Today’s dilemma about how to get close to nature wasn’t the first time that this issue has occupied my mind. A few years ago, I bought Richard Louv’s book Last Child in the Woods as a gift for my husband. Louv links the lack of nature in the lives of today’s wired generation to some of the most disturbing childhood trends, such as rising obesity, Attention Deficit Disorder and depression. He calls this phenomenon Nature Deficit Disorder: where children like to play indoors better than outdoors “because that is where the electrical outlets are”, where parents keep their children indoors because they are worried about the dangers of the outdoors (dirt, weather, predators, etc.), and where we just don’t have time to let our children roam outside.
Since this is something that is often on my mind, I knew that I had to write about it when I heard Marlene Power Johnston on the radio talking about the new Carp Ridge Forest Preschool that is opening this month where the kids will spend all day outdoors! Their press release does a great job of explaining the concept:
OTTAWA, ONTARIO–(Marketwire – Sept. 30, 2008) – A Yurt will replace a classroom when Canada’s first nature-based preschool for children launches on October 1, 2008. Carp Ridge Forest Preschool, situated on 190 acres of land, offers children aged three to six a chance to play in the woods on a daily basis.
Children will throw in their plastic toys for tree branches and their sneakers for boots, to head out and explore the great outdoors. They’ll do things like hiking, nature crafts, outdoor yoga, shelter-building, gardening, snowshoeing and much more. In an age where families worry about childhood obesity, over-usage of technology, environmental toxins, and climate change, this program offers something different.
“As a society, we’re greatly impacted by our lack of connection to the outdoors. Children are growing up in manufactured environments where they’re disconnected from nature, which can lead to all kinds of social issues,” said Marlene Power-Johnston, Coordinator of the Forest Preschool and mother of twenty-two month old Hazel. She became involved with the Ecowellness Centre after visiting many preschools in the Ottawa area. She felt disenchanted by the lack of natural space for children to play, and the lack of emphasis on environmental principles within conventional preschools.
The concept for the Forest Preschool, also known as “Forest Kindergartens,” originated in Europe. The whole premise of the preschool is that the children spend their entire days outdoors, where they move their bodies; explore their imagination and the world in a very hands-on manner. They do this rain or shine, with a building on site for more extreme weather conditions.
The Forest Preschool, runs out of the Carp Ridge Learning Centre, which is a Charitable Organization. They strive to increase children and youths’ access to nature. Subsidies are available to improve program accessibility for families with limited financial resources.
I love the concept! If it wasn’t a two hour drive away, I would definitely consider enrolling my kids there. My son does spend several hours outdoors each day at his preschool, but it is usually in a fenced in play area with play structures and plastic toys and not much in the way of free interaction with nature. They do learn about nature in school and spend some time wandering the school grounds looking for leaves and things like that, but it somehow isn’t the same. Makes me that much more determined to make the best of the time we do have together.
When corresponding with Marlene, she also gave me links to some related resources and similar programs
- What are Forest Schools?
- Forest Kindergartens are Booming in Germany
- Pioneer nursery stays outdoors – in all weathers (Scotland)
- KinderNature: A resource for early childhood educators
Getting kids outdoors frequently and at an early age is crucial in not only overcoming Nature Deficit Disorder, but also in making our kids care about the environment. Why would you care about something that you don’t value? But beyond getting them to enjoy and value nature, with the rapid toll that climate change is having on our world, we also need to get our kids to care about making changes in the way that we treat our world. We need them to question the way we do things now and come up with creative ways to reduce our carbon footprint.
With that in mind, here are some great resources for teachers, parents or volunteers that want to make the environment a priority in our children’s education:
- Environment Canada – Education Resources
- Government of Alberta – Environmental Education Resources
- City of Toronto – Environmental Education Resources
- Australian Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts – Sustainability Education resources for Students and Teachers
- Amy of Crunchy Domestic Goddess blogs about Combating Global Warming with Education
I hope this will inspire some of you to consider starting Forest Preschools like Marlene did or at least to get outdoors more often with your kids, to teach them about the environment, and to encourage their school to develop environmental programs.
Do you have any other great ideas or resources? If so, please let me and my readers know via the comments.


















{ 4 trackbacks }
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
Last Child in the Woods ––
Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder,
by Richard Louv
Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.
November 16, 2006
In this eloquent and comprehensive work, Louv makes a convincing case for ensuring that children (and adults) maintain access to pristine natural areas, and even, when those are not available, any bit of nature that we can preserve, such as vacant lots. I agree with him 100%. Just as we never really outgrow our need for our parents (and grandparents, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc.), humanity has never outgrown, and can never outgrow, our need for the companionship and mutual benefits of other species.
But what strikes me most about this book is how Louv is able, in spite of 310 pages of text, to completely ignore the two most obvious problems with his thesis: (1) We want and need to have contact with other species, but neither we nor Louv bother to ask whether they want to have contact with us! In fact, most species of wildlife obviously do not like having humans around, and can thrive only if we leave them alone! Or they are able tolerate our presence, but only within certain limits. (2) We and Louv never ask what type of contact is appropriate! He includes fishing, hunting, building “forts”, farming, ranching, and all other manner of recreation. Clearly, not all contact with nature leads to someone becoming an advocate and protector of wildlife. While one kid may see a beautiful area and decide to protect it, what’s to stop another from seeing it and thinking of it as a great place to build a house or create a ski resort? Developers and industrialists must come from somewhere, and they no doubt played in the woods with the future environmentalists!
It is obvious, and not a particularly new idea, that we must experience wilderness in order to appreciate it. But it is equally true, though (“conveniently”) never mentioned, that we need to stay out of nature, if the wildlife that live there are to survive. I discuss this issue thoroughly in the essay, “Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans!”, at http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/india3.
It should also be obvious (but apparently isn’t) that how we interact with nature determines how we think about it and how we learn to treat it. Remember, children don’t learn so much what we tell them, but they learn very well what they see us do. Fishing, building “forts”, mountain biking, and even berry-picking teach us that nature exists for us to exploit. Luckily, my fort-building career was cut short by a bee-sting! As I was about to cut down a tree to lay a third layer of logs on my little log cabin in the woods, I took one swing at the trunk with my axe, and immediately got a painful sting (there must have been a bee-hive in the tree) and ran away as fast as I could.
On page 144 Louv quotes Rasheed Salahuddin: “Nature has been taken over by thugs who care absolutely nothing about it. We need to take nature back.” Then he titles his next chapter “Where Will Future Stewards of Nature Come From?” Where indeed? While fishing may bring one into contact with natural beauty, that message can be eclipsed by the more salient one that the fish exist to pleasure and feed humans (even if we release them after we catch them). (My fishing career was also short-lived, perhaps because I spent most of the time either waiting for fish that never came, or untangling fishing line.) Mountain bikers claim that they are “nature-lovers” and are “just hikers on wheels”. But if you watch one of their helmet-camera videos, it is easy to see that 99.44% of their attention must be devoted to controlling their bike, or they will crash. Children initiated into mountain biking may learn to identify a plant or two, but by far the strongest message they will receive is that the rough treatment of nature is acceptable. It’s not!
On page 184 Louv recommends that kids carry cell phones. First of all, cell phones transmit on essentially the same frequency as a microwave oven, and are therefore hazardous to one’s health –- especially for children, whose skulls are still relatively thin. Second, there is nothing that will spoil one’s experience of nature faster than something that reminds one of the city and the “civilized” world. The last thing one wants while enjoying nature is to be reminded of the world outside. Nothing will ruin a hike or a picnic faster than hearing a radio or the ring of a cell phone, or seeing a headset, cell phone, or mountain bike. I’ve been enjoying nature for over 60 years, and can’t remember a single time when I felt a need for any of these items.
It’s clear that we humans need to reduce our impacts on wildlife, if they, and hence we, are to survive. But it is repugnant and arguably inhumane to restrict human access to nature. Therefore, we need to practice minimal-impact recreation (i.e., hiking only), and leave our technology (if we need it at all!) at home. In other words, we need to decrease the quantity of contact with nature, and increase the quality.
References:
Ehrlich, Paul R. and Ehrlich, Anne H., Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearances of Species. New York: Random House, 1981.
Errington, Paul L., A Question of Values. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1987.
Flannery, Tim, The Eternal Frontier — An Ecological History of North America and Its Peoples. New York: Grove Press, 2001.
Foreman, Dave, Confessions of an Eco-Warrior. New York: Harmony Books, 1991.
Knight, Richard L. and Kevin J. Gutzwiller, eds. Wildlife and Recreationists. Covelo, California: Island Press, 1995.
Louv, Richard, Last Child in the Woods — Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, 2005.
Noss, Reed F. and Allen Y. Cooperrider, Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Covelo, California, 1994.
Reed, Sarah E. and Adina M. Merenlender, “Quiet, Nonconsumptive Recreation Reduces Protected Area Effectiveness”. Conservation Letters, 2008, 1–9.
Stone, Christopher D., Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, California: William Kaufmann, Inc., 1973.
Vandeman, Michael J., http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande, especially http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/ecocity3, http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/india3, http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/sc8, and http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/goodall.
Ward, Peter Douglas, The End of Evolution: On Mass Extinctions and the Preservation of Biodiversity. New York: Bantam Books, 1994.
“The Wildlands Project”, Wild Earth. Richmond, Vermont: The Cenozoic Society, 1994.
Wilson, Edward O., The Future of Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002.
The Environmental education and training is very important in all over the world. The govt. of all over the nations takes big and quick steps to environment neat and green. But it’s not enough so we have to do more and more work on it. The cause of climate change is global warming and the cause of global warming is Environmental Pollution. So there is a need of awareness of people on make our Environment pollution free
and The Aarcher Institute of Environmental Training is give its contribute from many years in the field of environment training and education.
The Aarcher Institute of Environmental Training, Education and training is the sole mission of the Aarcher Institute. Aarcher Institute course offerings are continually updated and expanded to meet client requirements; however, all courses are not offered publicly at all times The Aarcher Institute of Environmental Training is an independently operated training institute supported by Aarcher, Inc. a well-respected environmental assessment, planning, and management firm. The Aarcher Institute’s public training courses continually change and grow. The Aarcher Institute offers a full range of private training options.http://www.aarcherinstitute.com/courses.html
Jacob Rodenburg, executive director of Camp Kawartha & The Kawartha Outdoor Education Centre discusses the book Last Child in the Woods in his article on bringing nature back into the lives of today’s kids. It was originally published in Peterborough Kids magazine.
http://www.ourkids.net/newsletter/news9/article2.php